Alejandro Morales Rosales National Urban Development and Mobility Policy 28 de octubre de Washington, D.C:
|
|
- Silvia San Martín Jiménez
- hace 7 años
- Vistas:
Transcripción
1 SUBSECRETARÍA DE DESARROLLO URBANO Y VIVIENDA Alejandro Morales Rosales National Urban Development and Mobility Policy 28 de octubre de Washington, D.C:
2 Mexico has a steady growth of URBAN POPULATION % 72%
3 Center of & económica economic y cultural activities
4 fragmented cities
5 public spaces as exclusion zones designed for Fragmentación de usos de la ciudad Personas lejos de otras personas car use only Las calles han dejado de ser un ESPACIO PÚBLICO
6 urbanization motorization
7 We thought that distances didn t matter anymore Vías rápidas DESTINOS LEJANOS
8 Segregated land uses Tlajomulco de Zuñiga, Low density
9 outdated paradigm + commuting = Loss on distance quality of life Vías rápidas DESTINOS LEJANOS
10 Millions of private vehicles Source: INEGI, 2013
11 Millions of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) Source: ITDP, 2012
12 Road space is La demanda aumenta a scarce public resource Ciudad de México
13 cost High Low benefit Building an elevated highway is four times more expensive than a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
14 Economic loss: 4% del GDP (Medina, ITDP 2012a)
15 Transportation sector has the biggest emissions CO 2
16 Public health problem Air pollution Road accidentes
17 Impoverishment of families Up to 50% of a household income is spent on transportation
18 Families House abandon their when 60% of their income is spent on transportation and mortage
19 (IMCO, 2009)
20 & Productivity Purchasing
21 MÉXICO: # Ranks countries on national transportation infrastructure 7 Only cities with rapid transit system
22 MÉXICO: lugar 69 de 144 países en infraestructura de transporte SDASHD Increasing public transportation doesn t solve the problem
23 Car-oriented public invesments
24 Paradigm shif needed Traffic to accesibility
25 Traffic paradigm + roads + congestion
26 Urban mobility paradigm Public transportation is not enough to reduce car use
27 Accesibility paradigm + = proximity of different land uses
28 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITMENT a new model of smart & sustainable urban development
29 Old vision of Urban Development present
30 New vision of Urban Development hereafter vertical housing mix of homes, jobs and services sustainable urban mobility high quality public space
31 & National Urban Development Housing Policy 1. New urban development model 4. Land use management 2. Sustainable and adequate housing 5. Risk prevention 3. Urban mobility 6. Regional development
32 National Urban Mobility Program Availability, Affordability & Quality of urban commuting
33 National Urban Mobility Program Challenges Institutional and legal framework Local government capacities Intersectoral coordination Information for decision making Urban mobility advocay Complete Streets Integrated Transport Systems Transit Oriented Development Transport Demand Management Urban Freight Management
34 Transit Oriented Development 2015 Esfuerzos Retos Status TOD Guidelines for the development of Urban Planning Programs Institutional and legal framework Marco normativo e institucional Implemantation of Local TOD Policies and Projects Toolkit Talleres Transversales de Impulso de Políticas y Proyectos DOT Local government capacities Intersectoral coordination Información e indicadores Capacidades técnicas Mass Public Transportation Indicators: coverage, compactness and density Information for decision making Cultura de la movilidad Coordinación intersectorial Promotion of TOD benefits between decision makers and citizens Urban mobility advocay
35 Transit Oriented Development National TOD Policy and Project Workshop
36 Transit Oriented Development Local workshops Guadalajara Mexico City Aguascalientes 41
37 Transit Oriented Development Information for decision making ZM ZMVM DF Extensión TPM (km) Población urbana (millones) Cobertura (km/ millón de hab) Metrorrey L1 Metrorrey L2 Ecovía L1 MTY ZMVM EDOMEX GDL LEÓN CHI PUEBLA Monterrey, Nuevo León 42 Fuente: Elaboración propia con información de BRTDATA.
38 Transit Oriented Development Information for decision making ZM Superficie Bruta (ha) Incremento ( ) Superficie con TPM L1 ViveBus ZMVM DF 9% ZMVM EDOMEX 229, % GDL 61, % MTY 76, % PUEBLA 67, % LEÓN 21, % CHI 27, % 43 Chihuahua, Chihuahua Fuente: Elaboración propia con información de BRTDATA.
39 Transit Oriented Development Information for decision making ZM Densidad Urbana (hab/ha) Densidad DOT (hab/ha) Densidad que propicia MUS (200/ha) ZMVM DF ZMVM EDOMEX LEÓN GDL Guadalajara, Jalisco MTY PUEBLA CHI ,6 44
40 Challenges for TOD implementation
41 Challenges for TOD implementation
42 Open spaces Challenges for TOD implementation Urban denisty
43 Transit Oriented Development Challenges for TOD implementation People don't object to the density of people. They object to the density of cars Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor
44 #CiudadHUMANA
45 #CiudadHumana