TALLER LATINOAMERICANO DE EVALUACIÓN DE IMPACTO TRABAJO EN EQUIPO MOZ/BRAZIL Team: Magalhães Miguel David Rocha Elias Machava Support: Christian Borja Matt Freeman Equipo 3 WASIS II 20 de Marzo de 2015 Lima, Perú
1. RESUMEN DE LA INTERVENCIÓN A. Actividades y productos del programa: Desenvolvimento do serviço de água e suporte institucional (Water Services and Institutional Support - WASIS II 2015-2019): Component A: Rehabilitation, Construction and Expansion of WTPs, DCs, Main Trunks, Network and House Connections. Component B: Institutional Support (regulation, asset management and decentralization). B. A quién está dirigido? MozUrbanPopulation. C. Dónde se lleva a cabo? Cities of Pemba, Nacala, Tete, Moatize, Chimoio, Manica, Gondola, Beira, Dondo and Maputo. D. Cuándo se lleva a cabo? 2016a2018 E. Nombre de las organizaciónes que lo implementan? FIPAG e CRA.
SERVICE ÁREA 1,3 Million People NORTH REGION CENTRAL REGION 1,4 Million People SOUTH REGION 400 Thousand People 2,1 Million People Souce: INE 2007 GREATER MAPUTO REGION
2. CADENA DE RESULTADOS PROGRAMA RESULTADOS INTERMEDIOS IMPACTO 1. Insumos: Funding from new operation Implementation plan Human Resources 2. Actividades: Physical Works: Procurement (service, goods & Works); Rehabilitation & Building (3 WTPs, 5 DCs & 50 Boreholes); Installation (100km Main Trunk, 1.000km Network, 100.000 HCon.) Institutional Support: Develop Capacity for Regulation (7 local commissions created); Capacity building on asset management (100 trained); Creation of decentralized systems (North & Central); Studies (master plan, beneficiary assessment). 3. Productos: Water available (+ 100.000 m3/day); Household water connections (100.000 HHC); Drinking water delivered (24 hours); Local Regulations created (7 reg.); New management (2 contracts for systems); Studies (2 master plan, 5 beneficiary t) 1. On Users: Increase water quality and availability; Increase awareness and costumers perceptions; User acceptability and satisfaction. 2. On Providers: Cost management; Asset management; Reliable service (24 hours, throughout the year); Water quality standards; Equity (socio-economic); Customer management. 1. On Users: Health (e.g., enteric disease) Equity (socio-economic) Cost savings 2. On Providers: Cost recovery and payment Sustainable provision by decentralized service.
3. PREGUNTAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN 1. What is the sustained impact of the program on increased service delivery to those already connected and those not connected to the system, in terms of: - Water quality and quantity - User acceptability and satisfaction - Water resource management (e.g., water conservation) - Health (e.g., enteric disease) - Equity (socio-economic) - Cost recovery and payment 2. What is the difference in uptake between subsidies to the household (consumer incentives) versus output-based payment (provider incentives)? 3. What is the impact of group payment incentives (e.g., lower water bill if you form a group) on water connection and sustained payment of water bill? 4. Can you improve the performance of the system through different regulatory structures for commissions involving monitory and non-monitory incentives? 5. What is the impact of institutional capacity building on the provider to maintain service levels, in terms of: - Cost management - Asset management - Reliable service (24 hours, throughout the year) - Water quality standards - Equity (socio-economic) - Customer management
4. DISEÑO DE EVALUACIÓN DE IMPACTO A. Increased water service delivery for households with\without water connection: Step wedge design with 3 phases Tratamiento: those whose system has been upgraded \ those who have been given option for connection Control: those whose system has not been upgraded\those who have not yet received option for connection B. Tamaño de la muestra: Tratamiento: approx 2.000 HH/icl.yt/to be determined by power calculation Control: same as treatment C. Regla de asignación del programa: non-random based on infrastructure plan
5. RECOPILACIÓN DE INFORMACIÓN A. Indicadores del programa que serán recopilados: Water quality and quantity User acceptability and satisfaction Water resource management (e.g., water conservation) Health (e.g., enteric disease) Equity (socio-economic) Cost recovery and payment B. Método de recopilación de información: Household survey C. Frecuencia de la recopilación de información: Quarterly D. Quién recopilará la información?: Local data collectors
Gracias!